![]() ![]() There are plenty of good reasons to be strategic in the font choices rather than using additional technology. Of course there are options like creating images, dynamic headlines, and siFR… but all of these techniques increase load time and development time. So most pages use Arial, Helvetica, or Georgia as their typefaces… and the world of the web remains slightly more bland.īut there are quite a few high quality typefaces that are available on most new computer systems and you can always fall back on the common ones. So as designers and developers we end up selecting the ones that we can safely assume is available on most computers today. There is an inherant problem, if the font you specify isn’t on the viewers computer it won’t render in that font. CSS has brought us many capabilities in terms of typography and the web, but we always seem to be limited to the same 4-5 typefaces over and over again. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |